🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a draft bill that include lowering the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, global health authorities raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, BAT suggests this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum one year after the bill passes.

The WHO actually suggests a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch says the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We live in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “The corporation runs its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, they said, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which includes growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.